ArticleMolecular therapy. Oncology2026
Neuroepithelial reprogramming and ERBB vulnerability in canine acanthomatous ameloblastoma.
Article in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine acanthomatous ameloblastoma (CAA) is a locally invasive benign oral neoplasm that is difficult to distinguish from canine oral squamous cell carcinoma (COSCC) due to overlapping features. Previous studies using bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) have demonstrated pronounced differences in programs related to hypoxia and cell proliferation. However, these studies lacked the resolution to elucidate the cellular heterogeneity of CAA relative to COSCC. We performed single-nucleus RNA-seq to define the cellular gene expression landscape of CAA, COSCC, and healthy gingiva. Across ∼205,000 nuclei, we identified two epithelial states uniquely enriched in CAA. The CAA-specific keratinocytes exhibited a neuronal-like expression program defined by synaptic regulators, KRAS-associated signaling pathways, and markedly elevated expression of PEG3 and ERBB4. These findings were validated by immunohistochemistry, which showed strong nuclear localization of PEG3 exclusively in CAA epithelium. A kinase inhibitor screen independently identified ERBB4 as a candidate therapeutic vulnerability, and pharmacologic inhibition with neratinib was effective. Together, these findings reveal a previously unrecognized neuroepithelial cell state that defines CAA, distinguishes it from COSCC, and reveals unique diagnostic and therapeutic signaling dependencies. Given the molecular/histopathologic parallels between CAA and human ameloblastoma, these data further position CAA as a naturally occurring comparative model for studying ameloblastoma therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.