ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Formation and remodeling of immunological niches in solid tumors: organ-specific architectures, inflammatory parallels, and therapeutic reprogramming.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor immunity is increasingly understood not only through the cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment, but also through spatially organized local niches that can help determine where immune recognition is initiated, constrained, suppressed, or therapeutically restored. This review develops an organ-conditioned and evidence-graded framework for tumor immunological niches as spatially localized, interaction-dependent, functionally consequential, and dynamically remodeled units. Rather than reproducing a general taxonomy of cancer immune niches, we focus on how shared niche-forming mechanisms are implemented differently by organ-specific tissue rules. We first distinguish the niche concept from broad tumor microenvironment descriptions, immune infiltration, immune compartments, and tertiary lymphoid structures. We then propose an operational evidence hierarchy that separates spatial association, recurrent interaction, functional consequence, perturbation-based validation, and therapeutic actionability. Next, we synthesize core mechanisms of niche formation, including tumor-intrinsic signaling, stromal and extracellular-matrix scaffolding, chemokine and cytokine wiring, vascular-hypoxic-metabolic boundaries, myeloid-centered suppression, and tissue-resident immune imprinting. Brain and lung tumors are treated as two organizing paradigms: immune-restricted niche architecture in the central nervous system and inflammation-primed niche architecture in the lung. Oral, liver, and pancreatic tumors are discussed comparatively to show how mucosal-microbial, tolerogenic-metabolic, and desmoplastic immune-exclusion rules reshape shared niche mechanisms. We further separate tumor-specific evidence, inflammatory analogies, and hypothesis-generating parallels to avoid overextending chronic inflammation or fibrosis models. Finally, we examine how niche architecture produces T-cell exclusion, antigen-presentation failure, suppressive myeloid-stromal feedback, and therapeutic resistance, and how release, access, and licensing strategies may guide organ-tailored combinations when supported by adequate evidence. This review argues that tumor immunological niches may serve as meso-level analytical units linking spatial organization, organ context, evidence strength, inflammatory parallels, and therapeutic vulnerability when their evidentiary status is explicitly defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.