ArticleCureus2026
Reference Intervals and Prediction Equation for Sustained Maximal Inspiratory Pressure in Healthy Adults.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure (SMIP), obtained using the test of incremental respiratory endurance, has been proposed as an index of inspiratory muscle performance reflecting both force generation and the ability to sustain inspiratory effort. However, reference intervals and prediction equations for SMIP in healthy adults have not been sufficiently established. This study aimed to establish sex- and age-specific reference intervals for SMIP, identify factors associated with SMIP, and develop a practical prediction equation. Methods This cross-sectional study included healthy adults aged 18 years or older. After exclusion of participants with respiratory or neuromuscular disease and those with missing data, 439 participants were included and stratified by sex and age (<35 and ≥35 years). Reference intervals were calculated for each partition using a nonparametric percentile method. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with SMIP, followed by multiple linear regression analyses to develop a prediction equation using age, sex, height, and weight. Results SMIP was highest in younger males and lowest in older females. The 95% reference intervals were 383.2-1209.9 pressure time units (PTU) in males aged <35 years, 141.0-1222.0 PTU in males aged ≥35 years, 109.5-667.8 PTU in females aged <35 years, and 97.3-617.1 PTU in females aged ≥35 years. In multivariable analysis, age, sex, and height were independent predictors of SMIP, whereas weight was not independently associated with SMIP after adjustment. The final model explained 56.9% of the variance in SMIP (adjusted R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.