ArticleIranian journal of otorhinolaryngology2026
Assessment of Results of Conchomeatoplasty Using Subjective and Objective Parameters in Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.
Article in Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conchomeatoplasty is an important step of canal wall down mastoidectomy performed to promote dry, self-cleaning ear. Various techniques of conchomeatoplasty have been described and each has documented good results. However, a consistent and reliable method of assessing the outcome has not been explored. This study focuses on assessing the results of radial incision technique of conchomeatoplasty advocated by us using both subjective and objective parameters. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was designed to assess 55 patients of canal wall down mastoidectomy with conchomeatoplasty. These patients were evaluated for the ear canal size at 3 and 6 months post operatively. A modified chronic ear survey questionnaire where patients' activity restriction, symptoms and medical resource utilization subscale were noted for subjective outcome. Objective evaluation analysed otoscopic visibility of superior limit, floor of mastoid bowl and sino-dural angle. Results: The mean size of external auditory meatus at 3 and 6 months were 9.861 mm and 10.145 mm respectively. At 6 months follow up, there was a significant association between visibility of landmarks and size of external auditory canal as well as with the necessity of water restriction. However, there was no association of size of ear canal with interference with social activity, frequency or quantity of ear discharge and frequency of physician's visit. Conclusion: Using subjective and objective parameters facilitates a consistent and measurable assessment of the outcome of conchomeatoplasty rather than considering the size of meatoplasty alone. The radial incision technique advocated in the present study gives good postoperative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.