ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2026
Pseudocode Generation from Clinical Protocol Flowchart using Large Vision-Language Models.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key component of developing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) involves translating clinical protocols into executable code linking to the backend Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems - a challenging, time-consuming, and error-prone task, particularly for flowchart-based protocols with complex logic and role-specific actions. This study investigates the potential of large vision-language models (LVLMs) to automate pseudocode generation from clinical protocols as an initial step in this process. Using emergency medical services (EMS) as a case study, we evaluated state-of-the-art LVLMs and finetuned two LVLMs for generating pseudocode that can support the development of CDSS for future EHR database integration. The results indicate that model finetuning leads to a substantial performance improvement of at least 15% in terms of BLEU or CodeBLEU for pseudocode generation and up to 20% in terms of F1 for medical terminology extraction. Although these models show promise, challenges remain in the interpretation of complex protocols with conditional assessments tied to specific roles of care providers. The Pass@1 evaluation results show that human expert evaluation is necessary to assess both the semantic and logical correctness of code generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.