Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602378›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2026

Dynamics of the stream of thought: insights from an accumulation-to-threshold model.

Adrien Kérébel, Jérôme Sackur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrien KérébelLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (LSCP), Département d'Études Cognitives de l'École Normale Supérieure (ENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7335-6030
Jérôme SackurLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (LSCP), Département d'Études Cognitives de l'École Normale Supérieure (ENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of the stream of spontaneous thoughts has been the object of increasing research in recent years. Here, we study the timing of transitions from one coherent thought episode to the next as one aspect of such dynamics. Participants either vocalized freely generated words or allowed their minds to wander during 2- to 3-min runs, and were instructed to report thought transitions by pressing a key. We first validate this subjective mental event segmentation, which enables us to measure the duration of coherent thought episodes. We then turn to model comparison to show that the timing of thought transitions is best explained by an accumulation-to-threshold mechanism. We further find that the threshold of this accumulation negatively correlates with participants' trait tendency towards disorganized thought. We speculate about the nature of the accumulated information and emphasize that individual variability in transition thresholds underscores the role of mental impulsivity in thought transitions.

Indexed as

accumulation modelsADHDattentionmetacognitionspontaneous thoughtstream of thought

Identifiers

PMID42602378
PMCPMC13474264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.