ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
Characterizing transition state in mouse vigilance with electroencephalogram-electromyogram hypnodensity.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: Vigilance-state transitions are continuous biological processes, yet conventional rodent sleep scoring relies on discrete epochs that obscure intermediate states. As no standardized framework exists for characterizing these intermediate states in rodents, this study aimed to characterize the temporal dynamics of transitions in mice and validate a machine-learning approach for objective detection. Methods: Chronic electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) recordings were obtained from male C57BL/6 N mice. We extracted 56-s windows containing stable transitions between wakefulness (WAKE), non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS), and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS). Eight trained experts manually annotated the onset and duration of transitions to establish ground truth and assess inter-rater reliability. Using quantitative EEG/EMG features (e.g. spectral power, complexity, and EMG variance) derived from stable states, support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were trained to predict transition midpoints in independent test animals. Results: Inter-rater agreement among experts was moderate to low, particularly for WAKE-to-NREMS and NREMS-to-REMS (N-R) transitions, reflecting inherent ambiguity in manual scoring. Temporal analysis revealed distinct dynamics across transition types; N-R transitions were significantly longer than all others, while REMS-to-NREMS transitions were the most abrupt. Despite the variability in human scoring, SVM models trained only on stable-state features successfully predicted expert-defined transition midpoints. Conclusions: Our approach not only characterizes the recognizable dynamics across transition types in mice, but also provides a reproducible framework for quantifying sleep-wake transitions, which is crucial for studying arousal stability and related impairments in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.