Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602339›Full record

ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2026.

Satpal Singh Arri, Vitaliy Androshchuk, Simon Redwood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satpal Singh ArriDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Cardiovascular Services, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2571-3328
Vitaliy AndroshchukDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Cardiovascular Services, London, UK.
Simon RedwoodDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Cardiovascular Services, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first implant over two decades ago, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis at high and intermediate risk, with mounting evidence to support its use in the younger lower-risk patient. Increasing operator experience and ongoing technological advances have both refined the procedure and reduced overall risk. However, important challenges remain, including coronary access after TAVI, conduction disturbance following implantation, the long-term consequences of paravalvular leak, cost-effectiveness and broader implications on healthcare systems. This review is timely following publication of the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease and recent landmark trials. We aim to provide an update on key areas of development including patient selection, imaging, management of coronary disease, valve durability and lifetime management.

Indexed as

cardiologycatheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: othercomputed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)echocardiographytreatmentValvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID42602339
PMCPMC13473772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.