ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2026
Point-of-care ultrasound in trauma: a systematic review of recent literature.
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a vital diagnostic tool in trauma care, providing rapid bedside imaging to improve critical decision-making. Despite its growing use, a comprehensive understanding of its efficacy remains limited compared with traditional imaging methods, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This systematic literature review aims to synthesize recent research evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of POCUS, and the impact of training and advancements in POCUS technology, highlighting their role in enhancing trauma care practices. Following PRISMA guidelines, a thorough search of databases such as Scopus and Web of Science was conducted, identifying peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2024. A total of 110 studies were selected based on their relevance to trauma applications of POCUS. Data were extracted, analyzed, and categorized into five themes: POCUS in (1) thoracic trauma, (2) abdominal trauma, (3) musculoskeletal trauma, (4) neurological and head trauma, (5) training and technological advances. The findings indicate that POCUS significantly improves diagnostic speed and supports earlier interventions, particularly in settings with limited access to advanced imaging. Furthermore, the review highlights the potential of POCUS to reduce reliance on more invasive procedures, thereby minimizing patient risk. Despite these advantages, challenges remain in standardizing training and ensuring consistent application across varied clinical environments. This review concludes that while POCUS is an effective adjunct to traditional imaging in trauma care, its full potential can be realized only through ongoing training and continued technological advancement. These insights underscore the need for further research to optimize POCUS protocols and expand their adoption in diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.