ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
A cross-sectional feasibility study of an English-language survey in Switzerland using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study aims: English is the fourth most-used language in Switzerland at 6%, yet no health survey has specifically sampled English-speaking respondents, despite having compulsory health insurance. The purpose of this prospective survey is to explore the feasibility of collecting empirical evidence on the health status of English-speaking respondents living in Switzerland. In addition to reporting psychometrics, we further examine substantive correlates of subjective health, such as migration status, residency duration, and planned residency in Switzerland. Methods: A cross-sectional design with purposive sampling was used to collect Results: Conclusion: English-speaking respondent uptake seems to be feasible with a relatively high completion rate of 73%. Furthermore, a preliminary inspection of psychometrics indicated good quality evidence. Future research should expand on questions regarding health service utilization and remaining psychometric criteria, such as criterion validity, responsiveness, and cross-cultural validity with Switzerland's three primary spoken languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.