Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602278›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Endocrine-related osteoporosis: bone quality, clinical phenotype, and targeted management.

Ivan Raffaele Cincione, Roberto Marcantonio, Marcellino Monda, Rita Polito, Maria Casillo, Antonietta Messina, Antonietta Monda, Fiorenzo Moscatelli, Giovanni Messina, Annalisa Panico

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivan Raffaele Cincione *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Roberto Marcantonio *Prevention and Protection Area, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marcellino MondaUnit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Rita PolitoDepartment of Psychology and Health Sciences, Pegaso Telematic University, Naples, Italy.
Maria CasilloUnit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonietta MessinaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonietta MondaDepartment of Human Science and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Telematic University, Rome, Italy.
Fiorenzo MoscatelliDepartment of Education and Sport Sciences, Pegaso Telematic University, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni MessinaUnit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Annalisa PanicoLoreto Crispi Endocrinology Unit, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary osteoporosis is a major but frequently under-recognized contributor to skeletal fragility, particularly in men, premenopausal women, patients with fragility fractures at unexpectedly preserved bone mineral density, and individuals with rapid bone loss or inadequate response to standard therapy. Endocrine disorders are among the leading causes because they affect bone remodeling, mineral metabolism, sex steroid signaling, glucocorticoid pathways, insulin-like growth factor activity, and parathyroid hormone regulation. Management requires both correction of the underlying endocrine disorder and pharmacological treatment of skeletal fragility according to fracture risk. This review provides a clinically oriented and guideline-informed synthesis of endocrine-related secondary osteoporosis, with a focus on disease-specific skeletal phenotypes, diagnostic red flags, and targeted management strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on the concept of bone quality as a major determinant of fracture risk and on the limitations of conventional tools such as BMD and FRAX in this setting. We propose a practical clinical framework that integrates endocrine phenotype, vertebral imaging, trabecular bone score, and biochemical assessment into fracture-risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making. This approach supports a shift from a purely densitometric model toward a mechanism-based strategy, enabling improved identification of high- and very-high-risk patients and facilitating the appropriate use of anabolic and antiresorptive therapies.

Indexed as

Bone DensityEndocrine System DiseasesOsteoporosisBone and BonesBone RemodelingFemaleHumansMalePhenotypebone qualityendocrine osteoporosisfracture risksecondary osteoporosistrabecular bone score

Identifiers

PMID42602278
PMCPMC13474069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.