ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Exploring the effectiveness and awareness of Anki flashcard application on medical student's academic performance: a cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: AFC flashcards (AFC) is a widely used digital flashcard application that allows users to create personalized flashcards, track progress, and receive feedback. A growing number of medical students at Alfaisal University have integrated AFC into their study routines. This study explores how medical students utilize AFC to learn and retain medical knowledge, and whether it helps grasp both pre-clinical and clinical concepts. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated self-administered questionnaire distributed to medical students from 1st to 6th year at Alfaisal University. A representative sample of 302 participants was calculated from an estimated population of 1400 medical students (95% confidence level, 5% margin of error). The questionnaire assessed AFC awareness, frequency of use, preferred features, and self-reported academic performance. Ethical approval was obtained (IRB No. 20248), and anonymity was ensured. Results: Of 306 surveyed students, students used AFC more frequently for memorization-based and basic science subjects. The primary self-reported benefit was information retention (89.1%), while the main barriers were time commitment (73.7%) and software unfamiliarity. Although a majority of AFC users perceived a positive association between AFC use and academic performance, multiple linear regression analysis revealed no statistically significant association between AFC use and CGPA (β = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.16, Conclusions: This study demonstrates the widespread use of AFC among medical students at Alfaisal University and its perceived benefits for learning and retention. While a significant correlation between AFC use and higher CGPA was not established, AFC may serve as a valuable supplementary tool for medical students, particularly for memorization-based subjects. Further research is needed to explore optimal AFC use and its impact on academic outcomes in broader medical student populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.