Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602256›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Impact of dose calculation algorithm on magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy for prostate and glioma.

Sacha Af Wetterstedt, Emilia Persson, Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson, Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Minna Lerner, Lars E Olsson, Tobias Pommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sacha Af WetterstedtRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Emilia PerssonRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Christian Jamtheim GustafssonRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Adalsteinn GunnlaugssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Minna LernerRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lars E OlssonRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Tobias PommerRadiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) enables magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy by providing electron density information for dose calculation. While sCT-based planning has been proven sufficiently accurate for convolution-based dose calculation algorithms, linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE)-based approaches exhibit higher sensitivity to tissue heterogeneities. This study evaluated the accuracy of both dose calculation algorithm types for MRI-only in prostate and glioma radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Clinical treatment plans for thirty-nine prostate cancer patients and seventeen glioma patients were recalculated on atlas- and deep learning (DL)-based sCTs and conventional CT using convolution- and LBTE-based algorithms. Target dose metrics were analyzed as relative differences, while organs of interest (OOI) dose criteria were evaluated as absolute differences between sCT- and CT-based calculations. Statistical significance was assessed using paired Results: For target volumes, statistically significant differences between sCT- and CT-based calculations were observed for both dose calculation algorithms ( Conclusions: Although the LBTE-based approach demonstrated higher sensitivity to sCT-related CT number discrepancies than the convolution-based dose calculation algorithm, the resulting dose differences remained within clinically acceptable limits, supporting the robustness of MRI-only radiotherapy for both atlas- and DL-based sCTs.

Indexed as

Acuros XBDose calculation algorithmGliomaMRI-only radiotherapyProstate cancerSynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID42602256
PMCPMC13473937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.