Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602199›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026

Sex differences in memory impairments after traumatic brain injury: mechanisms and models.

Isabella K Robson, Clement Hamani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabella K RobsonSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Clement HamaniSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of long-term cognitive impairment, with deficits in episodic memory among the most common and disabling consequences. Although biological sex is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of TBI outcomes, its role in shaping post-injury memory impairment remains incompletely understood. Findings from both clinical and preclinical studies are often inconsistent, and sex is frequently underrepresented in experimental designs. Clinical studies generally indicate that women experience worse cognitive outcomes after TBI, including more severe and persistent memory deficits and greater affective burden. In contrast, preclinical findings are more variable, with sex differences emerging in a domain-specific and context-dependent manner. Early animal studies often reported no significant sex differences, particularly in spatial memory tasks. More recent work reveals that males tend to show earlier and more widespread spatial learning impairments and greater vulnerability to anterograde memory deficits, while females more commonly exhibit delayed but persistent deficits in memory consolidation and retention. These behavioral differences are accompanied by sex-specific mechanisms. Altogether, sex differences in memory outcomes following TBI are complex, context-dependent, and shaped by both biological and methodological factors. Greater incorporation of sex as a biological variable in both clinical and preclinical research is essential. Moving toward a precision medicine framework, accounting for sex as a variable in therapeutic target selection and trial design will be important for optimizing cognitive recovery after TBI.

Indexed as

femalesmalesmemorypreclinical modelssextraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42602199
PMCPMC13473392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.