ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Empowering change: a prospective cohort study of an integrated cognitive behavioral therapy-based outpatient intervention for substance use disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Problematic substance use is a public health issue that causes significant physical and mental health and societal consequences. Integrated intensive outpatient treatment has shown promise in addressing the multifaceted nature of substance use disorders (SUD). However, the scientific literature on such integrative interventions remains limited. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an integrated, intensive outpatient intervention for clients with SUD in Sweden. Building on previous findings from the same clinic, this study analyzes a new cohort of clients and expands the scope of evaluation to include additional outcome measures, such as craving and affective states, alongside psychological and psychiatric assessments. Method: This study constitutes a naturalistic service evaluation, not a clinical trial, as it examines the outcomes of a pre-existing, routinely delivered outpatient program within Swedish municipal social services, without randomization, control conditions, or experimental manipulation of treatment. This is a prospective cohort study with a pre-post, within-subject comparison design. Between 2018 and 2023, 127 clients referred by social services, primarily diagnosed with SUD, participated in a four-month cognitive-behavioral therapy-based integrated intervention. 44% (N = 56) of them completed the intervention. Changes in clients' biological (craving), psychological (hope, hopelessness, self-esteem and affect states) and psychiatric (anxiety and depression) health were assessed using previously validated instruments at intake and at program completion. Results: Statistically significant, medium-to-large effect size improvements were observed across nearly all outcome domains. Clients who completed the intervention reported increased levels of hope and self-esteem, higher prevalence of positive affect and reduced depression, anxiety, negative affect, and craving (in terms of strength, frequency, and duration). A small, non-significant decrease in hopelessness was also observed, which is discussed in relation to the Bonferroni correction applied and the nature of hopelessness as a deeper cognitive-affective construct. Conclusion: This integrated, intensive, outpatient intervention appears to be effective in reducing biological, psychiatric and psychological symptoms while also enhancing protective factors such as hope, self-esteem, and affective resilience in individuals with SUD. These findings highlight the value of holistic, multimodal approaches in community-based addiction treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.