ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Optimizing belowground interactions in young rubber-banana intercropping via partial organic fertilizer substitution: root competition, soil nutrients, and microbial communities.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Optimal fertilization strategies for rubber tree-banana intercropping systems and their comprehensive impacts on belowground interactions remain inadequately characterized. This study systematically evaluated the effects of different fertilization regimes on root distribution, interspecific competition, and rhizosphere properties. Methods: The experimental design included four treatments: (1) rubber monoculture with conventional fertilization (CK); and three rubber-banana intercropping systems with different fertilization regimes: (2) conventional chemical fertilization (M1), (3) 30% organic nitrogen substitution (M2), and (4) 45% controlled-release nitrogen combined with chemical nitrogen (M3). Thus, the effect of intercropping per se can be assessed by comparing CK with M1, while the effect of fertilization strategies within intercropping is evaluated by comparing M1, M2, and M3. Results: Results demonstrated that the M2 treatment produced the most significant improvements, enhancing rubber tree height by 16.26% and stem girth by 8.17% compared to CK, while simultaneously supporting optimal banana growth. During the banana bud development stage, M2 increased rubber root biomass in the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm layers by 66.91%-115.84% and 140.08%-625.47%, respectively, compared to other treatments, and promoted banana root length density mainly in the surface layer (0-20 cm) by 79.98%-88.50%. Soil available N under M2 was elevated by 14.43%-26.49% across different soil layers at harvest, and available P increased by 12.72% in the 0-20 cm layer, while soil organic matter increased by 7.77%. Microbial community shifts showed strong positive correlations with increased soil nutrients; for example, Firmicutes was enriched by 131.00%, and key taxa such as Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were also significantly increased and positively correlated with root development. Importantly, M2 reduced root competition intensity (UICII) by 22.69%-31.65% during vigorous growth and bud development stages. Conclusions: Our integrated analysis demonstrates that substituting 30% of chemical nitrogen with organic nitrogen appears promising under the experimental conditions of this study, as it simultaneously enhances plant productivity, alleviates belowground competition, and improves soil ecological conditions. Therefore, this study provides a scientifically-grounded and potentially sustainable management strategy for enhancing the productivity and ecological sustainability of rubber tree-banana intercropping systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.