ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
From signal to significance: characterizing anthracycline-related hypercoagulable adverse events via pharmacovigilance, animal models, and clinical observation.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anthracyclines are widely used antineoplastic agents with well-recognized cardiotoxicity; however, reports of hypercoagulable adverse events (HC-AEs) remain scattered and incompletely described. A systematic characterization of these events across large pharmacovigilance databases may help to clarify reporting patterns and generate hypotheses for further investigation. Methods: We performed a disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the WHO Global Individual Case Safety Report Database (VigiBase) to identify HC-AEs reported in association with anthracyclines. Signals consistently observed in both databases were further explored descriptively with respect to reported drug-specific patterns and time-to-onset (TTO). To support hypothesis generation, exploratory analyses integrating transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), retrospective clinical coagulation parameters, and Results: Across both pharmacovigilance platforms, 26 HC-AEs were consistently reported in association with anthracyclines. Doxorubicin was associated with the widest range of reported HC-AEs, whereas daunorubicin and aclarubicin showed more specific reporting patterns involving cerebral or intracardiac thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation, respectively. The reported median TTO of HC-AEs following anthracycline exposure was 32.5 days (vs. 48.0 days in non-recipients, Conclusion: This multi-database pharmacovigilance analysis provides a systematic overview of HC-AEs reported in association with anthracyclines, highlighting drug-specific reporting patterns and variations in onset timing across age groups. While causal inference cannot be established, the concordant signals observed across independent data sources support heightened clinical awareness and hypothesis-driven surveillance of thrombotic complications during anthracycline therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.