ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Dual-domain adversarial learning and feature constraint for unsupervised anomaly detection in chest X-rays.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chest X-ray is the standard screening tool for pulmonary diseases, enabling early detection and timely intervention of lung lesions. Due to scarce and costly abnormal labeling of chest X-rays, unsupervised anomaly detection trained only with normal images has become a major research focus, especially, reconstruction-based methods are favored for learning normal data patterns and making it easier to visualize abnormal regions. Although the current reconstruction-based methods of chest X-rays have achieved good result, they have three problems. Firstly, over-reliance on pixel-level alignment in the spatial domain hinders the capture of global information. Secondly, single-layer feature comparison between original and reconstructed images lacks multi-layer and multi-image analysis, resulting in poor feature consistency. Thirdly, using reconstruction error as anomaly score struggles to balance sensitivity to anomalies and fidelity to normal. Using a reconstruction-based approach trained only on normal images, this study improves rapid screening of thoracic abnormalities and shifts screening criteria toward earlier detection of chest lesions. Methods: We propose an architecture DualA-AD including Dual-domain Adversarial Learning (DAL), Feature Constraint Module (FCM) and Distributed Anomaly Score (DAS). In the training stage, DAL captures image details and global information by integrating spatial and frequency domains for dual-domain adversarial reconstruction. While FCM improves feature consistency between reconstructed and original image by analyzing multi-layer feature difference within individual images and similarity differences across multiple images. In the testing stage, DAS enhances image discriminability by fitting a discriminator's output on the training set as the real distribution and quantifying the deviation of images from this distribution. On three mainstream public chest X-ray datasets, the model was trained using only normal chest X-rays and evaluated on their respective test sets. Result: In the experiments on three datasets, DualA-AD achieved the best AUC, ACC, and F1 scores against classical, general, and specialized baselines, with AUC improvements over the SOTA of 0.93, 0.77, and 0.48%, respectively. Conclusion: DualA-AD improves the accuracy for distinguishing normal and abnormal chest X-rays. The method provides an efficient scheme for fast, low-cost intelligent detection of lung abnormalities, with great potential for computer-aided chest radiographic diagnosis and early prevention and management of pulmonary disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.