Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602144›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Floral Scents of Deceptive

Danae Laina, Eva Gfrerer-Burgschwaiger, Jindřich Roháček, Sigrid Mulitzer, Marc Gibernau, Hans Peter Comes, Anja C Hörger, Stefan Dötterl

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danae LainaDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-5095
Eva Gfrerer-BurgschwaigerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-1327
Jindřich RoháčekDepartment of Entomology Silesian Museum Opava Czech Republic.
Sigrid MulitzerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.
Marc GibernauLaboratory of Sciences for the Environment CNRS - University of Corsica Ajaccio France.
Hans Peter ComesDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.
Anja C HörgerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6816-195X
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most angiosperms are pollinated by animals, with insects being the most abundant and diverse pollinators. However, our knowledge about the diversity of Diptera as floral visitors and pollinators, and about their attraction to flowers, is still limited. Fly-deceptive plant species, such as

Indexed as

Arum maculatumDipterafloral scentfly‐pollinationreproductive successSpelobia cambricaSpelobia clunipesSphaeroceridae

Identifiers

PMID42602144
PMCPMC13473747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.