Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Connect to work programme in Greater Essex: evaluation framework and study protocol.

Julia Gawronska, Dimitra Mouriki, Hannah Talor, Alastair Gordon, Johnathon Cuthbertson, Sarah Muckle, Lee Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia GawronskaHealth Determinants Research Collaboration Greater Essex, Essex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Dimitra MourikiHealth Determinants Research Collaboration Greater Essex, Essex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Hannah TalorHealth Determinants Research Collaboration Greater Essex, Essex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Alastair GordonHealth Determinants Research Collaboration Greater Essex, Essex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Johnathon CuthbertsonEssex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Sarah MuckleEssex County Council, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Employment is not merely a means of financial security. It is a key social determinant of health. The Connect to Work (CtW) programme aims to support people with disabilities, long-term health conditions, and other barriers to find, secure, and sustain meaningful employment. The CtW was launched in November 2024 as the commitment and investment in England and Wales to support the Get Britain Working Again white paper. The CtW programme in Greater Essex commenced in August 2025 and has since engaged several hundred individuals across the region. The primary aim of this study is to assess the employment-related changes, including progression into work, sustaining employment, and preventing job loss, during the programme's first year. The findings will inform subsequent years of the programme delivery and development, while contributing to the evidence base on supporting people with barriers to employment. Methods and analysis: This project will use a pre-post single arm study design and utilize a mixed-methods approach. Eligible participants are aged 18 or over and willing to engage in the CtW programme activities. The CtW programme in Greater Essex is delivered by Essex County Council in partnership with three expert providers: Essex Cares Ltd, Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, and Shaw Trust. The evaluation design includes an online survey, qualitative interviews, participant workshops, and economic evaluation. The survey is administered at baseline, with follow-up points at 3 and 12 months, and explores participants' current housing and financial situations, general health, motivation to seek employment, readiness to enter the workforce, and barriers to employment. Exit interviews with participants, programme facilitators, and wider stakeholders will capture their experiences of the programme, including barriers and facilitators encountered during implementation. Workshops with participants will map their journeys and generate better understanding of their experiences of the programme. Additionally, the economic evaluation will calculate the value of the CtW programme to the Greater Essex economy. Ethics and dissemination: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer- review publications, scientific presentations, and local dissemination activities. Ethical approval was obtained through the Anglia Ruskin University Research Ethics Committee (Reference number: ETH2526-0259).

Indexed as

EmploymentPersons with DisabilitiesEnglandHumansJob SecurityProgram EvaluationResearch DesignUnited KingdomWalesconnect to workemploymentevaluationGreater Essexpublic health

Identifiers

PMID42602130
PMCPMC13473255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.