Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602122›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Machine learning and individual variability in electrical field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response for anxiety in older adults in the ACT trial.

Junfu Cheng, Skylar E Stolte, Zeyun Zhao, Andrew O'Shea, Aprinda Indahlastari, Adam J Woods, Ruogu Fang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02851511 (Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02851511 nacompletednot on this map

Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2017 to 2022Enrolled379ConditionsAgingArmsCognitive Training, tDCS (active stimulation), tDCS (sham stimulation), Educational Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junfu ChengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Skylar E StolteCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Zeyun ZhaoJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Andrew O'SheaDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Aprinda IndahlastariCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Adam J WoodsSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Ruogu FangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults - The ACT GrantR01AG054077 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI COHEN, RONALD A, MARSISKE, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$6.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anxiety is highly prevalent in older adults and often co-occurs with neurodegenerative disorders, worsening cognitive decline and quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown therapeutic potential, but outcomes remain inconsistent due to individual neurophysiological variability. Method: We trained machine learning (ML) models to predict state anxiety reduction following active tDCS paired with BrainHQ cognitive training (tDCS + CT) in older adults with moderate/severe baseline state anxiety symptoms from the Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults (the ACT trial, NCT02851511). Our models predicted outcomes based on MRI-derived current density maps (J-maps) generated via finite element modeling. We evaluated the model using (1) repeated mixed-site nested cross-validation and (2) repeated cross-site held-out-site validation; in both settings, analyses were conducted on the 20 eligible participants. Results: The model achieved a mean balanced accuracy of 82% in the repeated mixed-site nested cross-validation and 72% in the repeated cross-site held-out validation. SHAP-based interpretation of our ML models identified the current density in posterior fusiform cortex and inferior temporal gyrus (posterior and temporooccipital divisions) as the most influential predictors of intervention response. Discussion: Posterior ventral temporal cortices emerged as critical substrates for predicting intervention response, consistent with prior studies linking fusiform and amygdala-temporal dynamics to anxiety severity and fearful face processing. These findings highlight how perceptual processes, particularly those mediated by the fusiform gyrus, shapes intervention response. Altogether, this work paved the way for ML-guided precision modeling to personalize non-invasive transcranial electrical interventions for anxiety in older adults.

Indexed as

electric field modelingfinite element modelinglate-life anxietymachine learningtranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID42602122
PMCPMC13473359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.