ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026
Machine learning approaches for electrocatalyst design in water splitting: a review for green hydrogen production.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of green hydrogen through water splitting requires highly efficient electrocatalysts, but the current trial-and-error-based synthesis or discovery is time-consuming, costly and resource-intensive. Machine learning (ML) provides a powerful, data-driven alternative that can model complex structure-activity relationships across large chemical spaces at orders-of-magnitude speed. This review systematically overviews the life cycle of the electrocatalyst research and development application of ML. First, the thermodynamic and kinetic principles of the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions are summarised, along with some well-adopted and accepted activity descriptors. Then we explore data sources, featurization approaches, and algorithms, and discuss the model space, from a simple interpretable model to a graph neural network to a generative model, in the context of the ML toolkit. Strategic applications are discussed for high-throughput virtual screening of alloys and single-atom catalysts, as well as multifunctional activity prediction for overall water splitting, and stability optimisation under operating conditions. The topic of emerging frontiers is highlighted, including high-entropy alloys, amorphous materials, and linking atomic-scale understanding to device-level performance through integration with density functional theory. Finally, the problems of data scarcity, model interpretability and the discrepancy between computational predictions and industrial implementation are discussed, along with future directions for closed-loop discovery and self-driving laboratories. Incorporating ML into electrocatalyst design and combining it with autonomous experimentation will revolutionise this process, from simulation to energy solution, dramatically speeding it up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.