ReviewHepatology forum2026
MELD 3.0: Exploring and expanding its utility beyond transplantation.
Review in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has evolved into a cornerstone of liver transplantation prioritization. With the recent development of MELD 3.0, which incorporates serum albumin and sex-adjusted variables, its predictive accuracy and applicability have expanded significantly. This review examines the potential clinical applications of MELD 3.0 beyond transplant selection, highlighting its utility as a broader prognostic tool across various hepatic and systemic conditions. Data from multiple domains suggest that MELD 3.0 provides meaningful clinical insight. In orthotopic heart transplantation, MELD 3.0 has demonstrated superior predictive power for short-term mortality and postoperative intensive care unit resource utilization. In acute variceal hemorrhage, it has maintained good discriminatory ability, although calibration challenges limit its use as a standalone tool. Among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and renal insufficiency, MELD 3.0 has shown moderate predictive value for survival but has been outperformed by albumin-bilirubin-based models. In transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures, MELD 3.0 has effectively stratified pre- and postprocedural risk, enhancing dynamic patient monitoring and decisions regarding transplant timing. For alcohol-associated hepatitis, MELD 3.0 has surpassed older models in predicting mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy, particularly in women and malnourished patients. In oncology, MELD 3.0 has contributed to mortality risk assessment in hepatic visceral crisis when combined with inflammatory markers. However, its performance has been less robust in hepatic hydrothorax, where mortality has occurred at lower MELD scores, and in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, where it has performed comparably to other MELD variants. Collectively, these findings underscore the growing relevance of MELD 3.0 as a generalizable risk stratification tool across acute and chronic liver-related conditions. Although further prospective validation is warranted, its incorporation into routine hepatology and multidisciplinary care pathways may enhance prognostic precision and inform therapeutic decision-making beyond transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.