Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602087›Full record

ReviewHepatology forum2026

MELD 3.0: Exploring and expanding its utility beyond transplantation.

Pavan Kumar Reddy Kalluru, Hassan Emad Buhulaigah, Kishan Kumar Allikesam, Deekshitha Kuchi, Abdul Muqtadir, Nirmal Onteddu, Apoorva Cherukuri, Teja Allagadda, Madhusree Kamakkagari, Hossein Rajali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pavan Kumar Reddy KalluruDepartment of Internal Medicine, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, California, USA.
Hassan Emad BuhulaigahDepartment of Gastroenterology, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, California, USA.
Kishan Kumar AllikesamDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, India.
Deekshitha KuchiDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, India.
Abdul MuqtadirDepartment of Internal Medicine, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, California, USA.
Nirmal OntedduDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Apoorva CherukuriDepartment of Gastroenterology, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, California, USA.
Teja AllagaddaDepartment of General Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospitals, Puducherry, India.
Madhusree KamakkagariDepartment of General Medicine, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, India.
Hossein RajaliDepartment of Gastroenterology, West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has evolved into a cornerstone of liver transplantation prioritization. With the recent development of MELD 3.0, which incorporates serum albumin and sex-adjusted variables, its predictive accuracy and applicability have expanded significantly. This review examines the potential clinical applications of MELD 3.0 beyond transplant selection, highlighting its utility as a broader prognostic tool across various hepatic and systemic conditions. Data from multiple domains suggest that MELD 3.0 provides meaningful clinical insight. In orthotopic heart transplantation, MELD 3.0 has demonstrated superior predictive power for short-term mortality and postoperative intensive care unit resource utilization. In acute variceal hemorrhage, it has maintained good discriminatory ability, although calibration challenges limit its use as a standalone tool. Among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and renal insufficiency, MELD 3.0 has shown moderate predictive value for survival but has been outperformed by albumin-bilirubin-based models. In transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures, MELD 3.0 has effectively stratified pre- and postprocedural risk, enhancing dynamic patient monitoring and decisions regarding transplant timing. For alcohol-associated hepatitis, MELD 3.0 has surpassed older models in predicting mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy, particularly in women and malnourished patients. In oncology, MELD 3.0 has contributed to mortality risk assessment in hepatic visceral crisis when combined with inflammatory markers. However, its performance has been less robust in hepatic hydrothorax, where mortality has occurred at lower MELD scores, and in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, where it has performed comparably to other MELD variants. Collectively, these findings underscore the growing relevance of MELD 3.0 as a generalizable risk stratification tool across acute and chronic liver-related conditions. Although further prospective validation is warranted, its incorporation into routine hepatology and multidisciplinary care pathways may enhance prognostic precision and inform therapeutic decision-making beyond transplantation.

Indexed as

liver diseases/diagnosisMELD scorerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42602087
PMCPMC13473250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.