ArticleGeneral psychiatry2026
Enhancing clinical interpretation of patient-reported outcomes: A cross-platform toolkit for clinically important difference estimation using R Shiny and statistical analysis system.
Article in General psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Estimating clinically important differences (CIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for translating statistical findings into clinically meaningful treatment effects. We developed estimating clinically important differences (ESTICID), a cross-platform toolkit implemented in both R Shiny and statistical analysis system, to estimate and visualise CIDs in longitudinal studies. Methods: ESTICID applies an anchor-based approach using linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts. The framework accommodates repeated measures, supports both continuous and categorical anchors and handles incomplete follow-up data under a missing-at-random assumption. A multicenter randomised controlled trial dataset was used for illustration. Examples: Using the illustrative dataset, we show that ESTICID generates clinically interpretable CID estimates across different levels of improvement and provides graphical outputs that facilitate interpretation. In simulation analyses, the estimates remained stable under increasing levels of missing follow-up data. The R Shiny implementation further enables interactive, browser-based use without programming. Conclusions: ESTICID provides a practical and accessible framework for anchor-based CID estimation in longitudinal PROM research. By integrating methodological rigour with cross-platform implementation, it may improve the interpretation of treatment effects, responder definitions, sample size estimation and evidence-to-decision processes in psychiatry and related clinical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.