Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602068›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2026

Preliminary assessment of sarcopenic obesity risk after sleeve gastrectomy using dual-modality imaging: a six-month MRI and DXA pilot study in women.

Matej Pekar, Veronika Horka, Denisa Hyvlova, Radovan Jirik, Jaroslav Uchytil, Marketa Rygelova, Petr Kutac, Hana Tomaskova, Dominik Vilimek, Pavol Holeczy and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04617392 (Research of Sarcopenia in Patients After Bariatric-metabolic Surgery - the Effect of Programmed Aerobic and Power Exercising on the Functionality, Volume and Morphology of Muscle Tissue), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04617392 naunknown statusnot on this map

Research of Sarcopenia in Patients After Bariatric-metabolic Surgery - the Effect of Programmed Aerobic and Power Exercising on the Functionality, Volume and Morphology of Muscle Tissue

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsSarcopenia, Obesity, Sarcopenic ObesityArmsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Strength endurance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matej PekarDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Veronika HorkaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Denisa HyvlovaInstitute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Radovan JirikInstitute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Jaroslav UchytilDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Marketa RygelovaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Petr KutacDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Hana TomaskovaInstitute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Dominik VilimekDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Pavol HoleczyDepartment of Surgery, Vitkovice Hospital AGEL, Ostrava, Czechia.
Jan MacaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Marek BuzgaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is characterized by excess adiposity combined with skeletal muscle loss, but the absence of standardized diagnostic criteria makes interpretation of muscle tissue changes after bariatric surgery difficult, and different diagnostic indices can yield markedly different conclusions about the same patients. Methods: This preliminary analysis from the SarxOb trial (NCT04617392) compared several body-composition indices for detecting SO risk in eleven female patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, prospectively followed for six months using dual-modality imaging - magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: Lean body mass (LBM) decreased significantly from 56.3 ± 6.2 kg to 47.6 ± 6.0 kg (p < 0.001), while LBM as a percentage of total body weight increased from 50.4 ± 3.2% to 57.9 ± 4.3% (p = 0.003), reflecting a disproportionately greater loss of fat mass than lean mass. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) decreased from 24.5 ± 3.3 kg to 20.1 ± 2.9 kg (p < 0.001). Critically, the choice of diagnostic index changed the apparent prevalence of SO risk entirely: by the ASM and ASM/height Conclusion: These results indicate that weight-adjusted indices detect a substantially higher burden of SO risk than traditional height-adjusted indices in this population, and that the choice of diagnostic index, not only the imaging modality used, is a major source of disagreement in reported SO risk prevalence after bariatric surgery. Given the small sample size inherent to this interim analysis of an ongoing trial, these findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. As functional muscle assessment was not available in this interim report, these findings should be interpreted as SO risk by body-composition criteria rather than a complete EWGSOP2/ESPEN-EASO diagnosis.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerydual-energy x-ray absorptiometryfat tissuemagnetic resonance imagingmusclessarcopenic obesity risk

Identifiers

PMID42602068
PMCPMC13473381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.