ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Identification and quantification of putative active constituents of huangqin decoction for ulcerative colitis treatment through the integration of chemical profiling, network pharmacology, and bioinformatics.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Huangqin decoction (HQD), a traditional Chinese medicine prescription, is used to treat gastrointestinal diseases, including ulcerative colitis (UC). However, systematic research on the components of HQD remains insufficient. Therefore, we aimed to perform chemical profiling, network pharmacology, and bioinformatics analyses of HQD to identify candidate constituents potentially associated with UC and to establish a quantitative method for their determination in HQD. Methods: Qualitative chemical profiling was performed to identify 51 compounds in HQD, and their potential targets were predicted. UC-related target genes were identified by combining results from public and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed to investigate the biological processes and signaling pathways associated with UC. Moreover, protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed. Based on these results, 15 putative active constituents of HQD were selected and quantified. Molecular docking analysis was then performed to evaluate the binding interactions between these compounds and key target proteins. Results: A total of 947 HQD component-related, 1,868 UC-related, and 2,930 GEO database-related target genes were intersected to obtain 109 common target genes for HQD and UC. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses indicated that these targets were mainly associated with inflammatory and immune-related biological processes and signaling pathways. Among the identified targets, NOS2, AHR, MMP3, MMP9, and PRKCQ were highlighted as potential key targets. The analysis of three batches of HQD samples revealed that baicalin had the highest content. Molecular docking results indicated favorable predicted interactions between the putative active compounds and core target proteins, with several compound-target pairs exhibiting docking scores below -11.0 kcal/mol. Discussion: This study not only provides a comprehensive chemical profile of HQD but also presents a new approach for evaluating and managing quality based on putative active constituents. These findings may serve as a scientific basis for further pharmacological and clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.