Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

An evolutionary perspective on beautification: attractiveness, autonomy, and connectedness in men's romantic judgment across mating contexts.

Chun Zhao, Shaokang Chen, Hongya Zhou, Shiwen Qin, Yu Zou, Yimin Wang, Jien Guo, Xingyu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chun Zhao *School of Fine Arts and Design, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shaokang Chen *School of the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Hongya ZhouSchool of Fine Arts and Design, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shiwen QinSchool of the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Yu ZouFaculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Yimin WangFaculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Jien GuoFaculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Xingyu LiuSchool of Fine Arts and Design, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dress can be considered a visible and flexible form of female beautification that may communicate attractiveness as well as social and relational cues. However, less is known about how men interpret dress-based beautification cues when evaluating women as potential romantic partners across different mating contexts. The present study examined whether perceived attractiveness, autonomy, and connectedness derived from female dress jointly predict men's romantic judgment and whether these associations differ between short-term and long-term relationship contexts. Methods: A between-subjects design was used in which heterosexual male participants ( Results: Relationship context moderated the associations with attractiveness and autonomy; attractiveness was more influential in short-term judgment, whereas autonomy showed a stronger association in long-term judgment. The interaction for connectedness was in the predicted direction but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: These findings suggest that dress-based cues are weighed differently across mating contexts. Attractiveness, autonomy, and connectedness converge to predict romantic judgments, with varying differences depending on the mating context.

Indexed as

attractivenessautonomybeautificationconnectednessromantic judgment

Identifiers

PMID42602027
PMCPMC13473000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.