SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2026
Effectiveness of adjunctive herbal medicine in the management of post-stroke thalamic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke thalamic pain (PSTP) represents one of the most challenging types of refractory central neuropathic pain. The application of herbal medicine alongside Western medicine (WM) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic option for managing PSTP. Nevertheless, its comprehensive effectiveness and safety have yet to be conclusively established. Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine combined with WM for the management of PSTP. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2025 to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating combined herbal medicine and WM against WM monotherapy in the management of PSTP. Outcomes included pain intensity measures (VAS, PPI, PRI), anxiety and depression scales (HAMA, SAS, HAMD and SDS), overall treatment effectiveness and adverse events. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The GRADE framework was used to appraise the strength of evidence for specific results. Trial sequential analysis was carried out with TSA software. Results: The systematic review encompassed 16 trials, incorporating 1,122 participants. The pooled analysis showed that herbal medicine combined with WM was associated with a higher total effective rate than WM alone (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.28-1.49, Conclusion: Evidence from this systematic review indicates that adjunctive herbal medicine combined with WM may have potential benefits in reducing pain, anxiety, and depression, and improving clinical response in patients with PSTP. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations and the exclusive inclusion of studies from China. Further rigorous, multicenter, and multinational trials are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024494796).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.