Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602012›Full record

ReviewHepatology forum2026

Large language models in hepatology: A systematic review.

Thanathip Suenghataiphorn, Narisara Tribuddharat, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Narathorn Kulthamrongsri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thanathip SuenghataiphornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Griffin Hospital, Derby, CT, United States.
Narisara TribuddharatSt. Elizabeth Medical, Boston, MA, United States.
Pojsakorn DanpanichkulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Narathorn KulthamrongsriUniversity of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), has opened new frontiers in healthcare, with emerging implications for hepatology. This systematic review synthesizes the current state of research on the application of LLMs in hepatology, focusing on their capabilities in real-world clinical settings, limitations, and future directions. Materials and Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID as a search platform, were used to identify eligible studies from inception to January 2025. Eligible studies investigated the clinical utility and performance of LLMs in hepatology, with a clear comparison to a defined ground truth. Key findings were extracted and synthesized narratively. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in each study. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in this review. Our analysis reveals that LLMs demonstrate promising capabilities in processing textual and visual data related to various liver diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma, cirrhosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. LLMs effectively assisted with radiological image interpretation, provided clinical decision support, and generated patient education materials. However, the accuracy of these models was highly variable, depending on the specific task and the complexity of the clinical scenario. Limitations, such as the generation of inaccurate or misleading information ("hallucinations"), dependence on training data quality, and ethical considerations, were identified across multiple studies. Conclusion: Generative AI demonstrates feasibility across various hepatology applications, but study heterogeneity and significant challenges remain regarding accuracy, reliability, and safety. Future integration necessitates further research into training methods, data quality, ethical considerations, and real-world validation against standardized benchmarks.

Indexed as

Generative AIhepatologylarge language modelsliversystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42602012
PMCPMC13473248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.