ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
An EEG-based fatigue detection framework integrating interpretable feature selection and efficient temporal modeling.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fatigue is a critical factor contributing to operational errors, traffic accidents, and psychological disorders. A major challenge in current fatigue detection lies in the difficulty of clearly identifying fatigue-related neural channels in the brain, which hinders the accurate extraction of effective features from high-dimensional electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Methods: This study proposes the AXELLSTM fatigue detection framework, an EEG-based cross-subject fatigue detection framework that integrates interpretable feature selection with efficient temporal modeling. Specifically, a nested leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation strategy was adopted to evaluate cross-subject generalization and reduce potential data leakage during feature and channel selection. Within each LOSO fold, ANOVA and XGBoost were first used to identify discriminative fatigue-related features, followed by an L1-regularized sparse selection model to estimate channel importance. Furthermore, an EfficientLSTM model was designed by integrating a feature compression module, bidirectional long short-term memory network, channel attention, and temporal attention mechanisms to capture sequence-level EEG temporal representations. Results: The results showed that eight features, including mean, RMS, zero-crossing rate, gamma power, beta power, standard deviation, variance, and peak-to-peak value, were consistently selected across all LOSO folds. In addition, 18 EEG channels, including F8, AF8, TP8, F2, Fp1, F4, FT10, F6, Fz, P7, FT9, O1, C5, FT8, CP4, F3, FC6, and P3, were stably retained, suggesting that fatigue-related EEG information is distributed across frontal, frontopolar, frontotemporal, parietal, and occipital regions. Under the LOSO protocol, EfficientLSTM achieved an accuracy of 0.7454 ± 0.2147, balanced accuracy of 0.7436 ± 0.2139, and Macro-F1 of 0.7143 ± 0.2452, with 0.1959 M parameters, a model size of 0.7474 MB, and 3.7069 M FLOPs. Compared with the baseline models, EfficientLSTM obtained the highest average Macro-F1 and showed a favorable balance between cross-subject recognition performance, model complexity, and temporal modeling capability. Discussion: These findings indicate that the proposed AXELLSTM framework provides an interpretable and computationally efficient solution for EEG-based fatigue detection and offers potential support for the development of portable fatigue monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.