ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Disability and sexual and reproductive health outcomes among women in Cambodia: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2021-22 demographic and health survey.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Women with disabilities may face communication, autonomy-related, provider-level, and structural barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Population-based evidence from low- and middle-income countries remains limited, particularly by functional domain. Objective: To examine associations between disability and contraceptive knowledge, unmet need for family planning, and unintended pregnancy among women in Cambodia. Methods: We analysed data from 19,485 women aged 15-49 years who participated in the 2021-22 Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey. Disability was measured using the Washington Group Short Set and classified by severity and functional domain. Knowledge of modern contraception was assessed among all women, unmet need among currently married or cohabiting women, and unintended pregnancy among currently married or cohabiting women with a recent live birth. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios, adjusting for age, education, wealth, residence, and marital status where applicable. Additional analyses examined functional-domain associations and stratified unintended pregnancy by age, education, and wealth. Results: Overall, 16.5% of women reported at least some functional difficulty, including 1.0% with severe disability. Severe disability was associated with lower adjusted odds of knowing a modern contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.29). Among currently married or cohabiting women, severe disability was associated with higher adjusted odds of unmet need for family planning (adjusted odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.49). Among married or cohabiting women with a recent live birth, mild disability was associated with higher adjusted odds of unintended pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.79); for severe disability, the confidence interval included the null (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 0.39-5.18). Functional-domain analyses suggested lower knowledge and higher unintended pregnancy among women with communication, hearing, remembering/concentrating, or self-care difficulties. In descriptive stratified analyses, disability-related differences in unintended pregnancy were more pronounced among older women, women with less than primary education, and women in the poorest wealth quintile. Conclusions: Disability-related SRH inequities in Cambodia vary by outcome, severity, and functional domain. Family-planning services should address communication access, supported decision-making, provider competence, privacy, and socioeconomic barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.