ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2026
A bibliometric analysis of research on developmental dysplasia of the hip (2000-2025): Trends, leading contributors, impact, and collaboration patterns.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: It was aimed to evaluate publication trends, scientific impact, and collaboration patterns in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) research. Methods: DDH-related publications indexed in the Web of Science database between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2025, were analyzed. Publication output, citation metrics, author and institutional collaboration networks, leading journals, and major research themes were assessed. Results: A total of 3462 articles were identified. Annual publication output increased substantially over the study period. The most cited article, by Steppacher et al., reported long-term outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy. Sankar WN (USA) was the most prolific author, while Clohisy JC (USA) had the highest citation impact and h-index. Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China) produced the greatest number of publications, whereas Western institutions achieved higher citation impact despite lower publication volumes. The USA led in publication output, while Switzerland demonstrated the highest citation impact. North American authors and institutions showed the strongest international collaboration rates, with the USA occupying the central position in the global collaboration network. The Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics published the largest number of DDH-related articles. Research themes exhibited notable geographical variation. Conclusion: DDH research has grown rapidly over the past 25 years. North American and Western European researchers have played a leading role through strong international collaborations and publication in high-impact journals. Publication quality and global partnerships appear to be key determinants of scientific influence in the field. Significance of the study: This study provides novel bibliometric insights into the current landscape of DDH research for trainees, researchers, clinicians, and policymakers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.