ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Optimization of perioperative nutrition management based on the ERAS protocol for improving postoperative recovery in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of an ERAS-based perioperative nutrition management bundle on nutritional status (indicated by prealbumin), postoperative complications (postoperative nausea and vomiting, PONV), and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to provide preliminary evidence for the standardization of ERAS nutrition protocols in orthopedic practice. Methods: A total of 96 patients scheduled for TKA between January 2025 and December 2025 were allocated into two groups (control group, Results: The nutrition group had significantly shorter fluid fasting time (2.08 ± 0.28 vs. 7.23 ± 3.72 h, Conclusion: In this prospective comparative study, an ERAS-based perioperative nutrition protocol was associated with shorter fluid fasting time, better preservation of early postoperative prealbumin levels, a lower incidence of PONV, and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional fasting, without increasing perioperative blood loss or prolonging hospital stay. These findings support the safety and feasibility of this protocol; however, due to the quasi-randomized design and exploratory nature of the secondary analyses, these associations should be interpreted with caution. They require confirmation in larger, randomized trials with longer follow-up and functional outcome assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.