ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Impact of water deprivation on broilers divergently selected for water efficiency.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sustainable water use in poultry production is becoming pivotal. Extreme weather events and increased water scarcity may increase the risk of temporary disruptions in freshwater access. To address this challenge, the aim of this study was to determine how broilers selected for low (LWE) and high (HWE) water conversion efficiency responded to water deprivation. Methods: Straight-run LWE (n=90) and HWE (n=89) broilers were raised in 12 pens (6 pens per line). On D25 and D32, half of the pens were subjected to water deprivation for a minimum of 12 h (deprived), whilst the remaining pens had Results: LWE broilers consistently weighed more than HWE (p<0.05), whereas water deprivation did not affect body weight at either time point. From D14 onward, LWE broilers had higher feed and water conversion ratios than HWE (p<0.05). Water intake tended to differ between lines, with LWE broilers having the greater post-deprivation water intake (p=0.06). Water deprivation resulted in lower beak surface temperatures (p<0.001) and changes in blood chemistry consistent with dehydration, with deprived broilers having lower bicarbonate (p=0.01), base excess (p=0.02), and total carbon dioxide levels (p=0.02), and increased sodium levels (p<0.001) than controls. Water deprivation did not affect circulating glucocorticoid concentrations, but it altered central neurochemical activity, primarily through increased serotonin turnover (p<0.05). Drinking behavior did not differ between controls of either line, but HWE-deprived broilers were less likely to remain near drinker nipples immediately after water access was restored than LWE-deprived broilers (p<0.05) on D32. Discussion: Water deprivation induced physiological signs of dehydration and compensatory drinking behavior, with limited evidence of a stress response, and selection for water efficiency did not result in clear resilience to short-term water deprivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.