Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601927›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Impact of water deprivation on broilers divergently selected for water efficiency.

Rosie H Whittle, Gregory S Fraley, Colin G Scanes, Sara K Orlowski-Workman, Maricela A Maqueda, Alexander H Nelson, Zachary Grider, Shawna L Weimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosie H WhittleDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Gregory S FraleyDepartment of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Colin G ScanesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Sara K Orlowski-WorkmanDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Maricela A MaquedaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Alexander H NelsonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Zachary GriderDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Shawna L WeimerDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sustainable water use in poultry production is becoming pivotal. Extreme weather events and increased water scarcity may increase the risk of temporary disruptions in freshwater access. To address this challenge, the aim of this study was to determine how broilers selected for low (LWE) and high (HWE) water conversion efficiency responded to water deprivation. Methods: Straight-run LWE (n=90) and HWE (n=89) broilers were raised in 12 pens (6 pens per line). On D25 and D32, half of the pens were subjected to water deprivation for a minimum of 12 h (deprived), whilst the remaining pens had Results: LWE broilers consistently weighed more than HWE (p<0.05), whereas water deprivation did not affect body weight at either time point. From D14 onward, LWE broilers had higher feed and water conversion ratios than HWE (p<0.05). Water intake tended to differ between lines, with LWE broilers having the greater post-deprivation water intake (p=0.06). Water deprivation resulted in lower beak surface temperatures (p<0.001) and changes in blood chemistry consistent with dehydration, with deprived broilers having lower bicarbonate (p=0.01), base excess (p=0.02), and total carbon dioxide levels (p=0.02), and increased sodium levels (p<0.001) than controls. Water deprivation did not affect circulating glucocorticoid concentrations, but it altered central neurochemical activity, primarily through increased serotonin turnover (p<0.05). Drinking behavior did not differ between controls of either line, but HWE-deprived broilers were less likely to remain near drinker nipples immediately after water access was restored than LWE-deprived broilers (p<0.05) on D32. Discussion: Water deprivation induced physiological signs of dehydration and compensatory drinking behavior, with limited evidence of a stress response, and selection for water efficiency did not result in clear resilience to short-term water deprivation.

Indexed as

behaviorbroilerphysiologywater deprivationwater efficiencywelfare

Identifiers

PMID42601927
PMCPMC13472827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.