Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601854›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Pelvic solitary fibrous tumors: clinical manifestations, surgical management and long-term outcomes.

Xinji Yang, Lei Liu, Xiaofei Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinji YangDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaofei HouDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pelvic solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm with marked clinical and radiological heterogeneity, posing significant diagnostic challenges. Standardized management strategies remain lacking for special clinical scenarios, including paraneoplastic syndromes, synchronous primary malignancies, and pregnancy-associated incidental diagnosis. Methods: This single-center retrospective case series included 3 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed pelvic SFT who underwent surgical resection at Peking University Third Hospital between October 2018 and September 2025. Clinical, radiological, surgical, pathological, and long-term follow-up data were systematically collected, and a narrative literature review was conducted to refine clinical management. Results: The three patients presented with distinct rare phenotypes: a 17.5 cm giant tumor complicated by Doege-Potter syndrome, synchronous low-grade bladder urothelial carcinoma, and an asymptomatic tumor incidentally detected during twin pregnancy. All achieved R0 radical resection via individualized open, robot-assisted, or laparoscopic approaches, with no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II perioperative complications. All tumors showed characteristic nuclear STAT6 positivity and CD34 expression, with uncommon MDM2/CDK4 and SMA/desmin co-expression. At median 36-month follow-up (3-84 months), no recurrence or metastasis was observed. Conclusions: Complete R0 resection is the cornerstone of pelvic SFT treatment. Individualized surgery is safe even for complex cases. STAT6 positivity is the diagnostic gold standard. High-risk patients may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, and lifelong follow-up is mandatory for late recurrence.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyDoege-Potter syndromeimmunohistochemistrypelvic solitary fibrous tumorsurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID42601854
PMCPMC13472793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.