ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Mechanisms and impacts of migration by moose: The role of wildfire.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and impacts of migration by moose: The role of wildfire.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anthropogenic disturbances and environmental change have resulted in the loss of migratory behaviors, an important life history strategy of many species. Identifying the mechanisms and ecological benefits of migratory behavior is important for conservation and management decision-making. We evaluated the putative mechanisms influencing partial migration in moose (Alces americanus) populations occupying landscapes characterized by anthropogenic and natural disturbances. We quantified differences in the ecology of moose that migrated or stayed resident on their winter range. Also, we assessed three possible effects of the choice to migrate: occurrence of parturition, adult survival, and cause of adult death. Wildfire disturbance in the winter range had the strongest influence on whether an individual migrated and most migratory moose experienced less wildfire disturbance in their summer range than their winter range. However, not all migrants were successful at reducing the amount of wildfire disturbance they experienced in their summer range. Moose were more likely to give birth if they migrated a relatively long distance in the spring of the previous year. Movement strategies did not affect the probability of adult survival, but they were associated with the causes of adult mortality. Residents were more likely to die of health-related causes while migrants were more likely to die from predation. Increased wildfire severity in the summer range, associated with warmer and drier climates, could alter migratory behaviors and the benefits of migration for moose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.