SynthesisInternational journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience2026
Data-Driven Approaches for Autism Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Datasets.
Synthesis in International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition with a broad spectrum of symptoms, which makes timely and accurate diagnosis challenging. The development of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has created opportunities for automated ASD screening and detection. This systematic review focuses on the analyses of 59 peer-reviewed studies on unimodal and multimodal approaches to ASD detection that were published between 2019 and 2025. The results demonstrated that classical ML algorithms (such as logistic regression [LR], support vector machines [SVM] and random forests [RF]) and DL models (convolutional neural networks [CNN], recurrent neural networks (RNN) and transformers) were used to assess the accuracy of the diagnosis for a variety of data modalities ranging from behavioural measures to neuroimaging, electroencephalography (EEG), eye tracking and speech, with accuracy from 68% to 99%. A careful examination of these studies, however, shows that they share certain common flaws, including small sample size, demographic bias, overfitting and absence of external validation. Hybrid multimodal frameworks have been shown to yield consistent performance improvements over unimodal frameworks, with accuracies of 95%-99% achieved through attention, graph-based learning and hybrid fusion approaches. This review highlights four major points: (1) a critical review of dataset ethics and validity, even for non-clinical facial image datasets; (2) an architectural comparison of multimodal fusion strategies (early fusion, late fusion and hybrid fusion) focusing on computational complexity and clinical applicability; (3) a quantitative summarization of the performance trends by modalities and sample size; and (4) a structured review of indicators of reproducibility and regulatory hurdles for clinical translation. This review suggests the need to develop large, well-balanced datasets, the application of explainable AI (XAI) techniques, standardization (e.g., brain imaging data structure [BIDS]) and regulatory guidelines for facilitating the clinical translation of ASD detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.