Observational studyMedicine2026
Lactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall and progression-free survival among patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy: A two-center retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platinum plus etoposide combined with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, reliable prognostic biomarkers are yet to be identified. The lactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratio (LLR) is a potential indicator of tumor metabolism and host immune response; a high LLR is correlated with a poor prognosis in other carcinomas. The LLR may be a more comprehensive indicator of prognosis than the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which mainly reflect host immune status. This study evaluates the prognostic value of the LLR in patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. This retrospective, two-center study was conducted at 2 university hospitals in Japan and analyzed 64 patients with extensive-stage SCLC or post-chemoradiotherapy recurrence of limited-stage SCLC who received platinum-etoposide plus a PD-L1 inhibitor as first-line therapy between August 2019 and December 2023. The LLR, NLR, and PLR were calculated from blood tests immediately before the start of first-line therapy, and cutoff values were set using the X-tile software. The prognostic significance of these markers was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. Of the 64 patients included, 10 (16%) had high LLR (>471.5). The median duration of observation was 10.5 months (interquartile range: 6.0-19.0 months); by the time of data cutoff, 56 patients (87.5%) had experienced progressive disease and 36 (56.3%) had died. The high LLR group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis was performed using only those factors (LLR/ECOG PS/bone metastasis regarding OS and LLR/bone metastasis regarding PFS) identified as significant in univariate analyses. A high LLR was an independent predictor of worse OS and PFS. While the NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS, neither NLR nor PLR was a significant predictor of PFS. The LLR is a novel potential prognostic biomarker that integrates tumor metabolism and host immunity in patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Because it can be readily calculated from routine blood tests, it may serve as a cost-effective tool for risk stratification. However, further prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.