Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601763›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Lactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts overall and progression-free survival among patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy: A two-center retrospective observational study.

Tomofumi Hirose, Shuhei Teranishi, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Anna Tanaka, Yukihito Kajita, Ayami Kaneko, Masaki Yamamoto, Makoto Kudo, Takeshi Kaneko

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomofumi HiroseRespiratory Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-9251-7692
Shuhei TeranishiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-144
Nobuaki KobayashiDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Anna TanakaRespiratory Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yukihito KajitaDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Ayami KanekoDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Masaki YamamotoRespiratory Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Makoto KudoRespiratory Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeshi KanekoDepartment of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platinum plus etoposide combined with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, reliable prognostic biomarkers are yet to be identified. The lactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratio (LLR) is a potential indicator of tumor metabolism and host immune response; a high LLR is correlated with a poor prognosis in other carcinomas. The LLR may be a more comprehensive indicator of prognosis than the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which mainly reflect host immune status. This study evaluates the prognostic value of the LLR in patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. This retrospective, two-center study was conducted at 2 university hospitals in Japan and analyzed 64 patients with extensive-stage SCLC or post-chemoradiotherapy recurrence of limited-stage SCLC who received platinum-etoposide plus a PD-L1 inhibitor as first-line therapy between August 2019 and December 2023. The LLR, NLR, and PLR were calculated from blood tests immediately before the start of first-line therapy, and cutoff values were set using the X-tile software. The prognostic significance of these markers was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. Of the 64 patients included, 10 (16%) had high LLR (>471.5). The median duration of observation was 10.5 months (interquartile range: 6.0-19.0 months); by the time of data cutoff, 56 patients (87.5%) had experienced progressive disease and 36 (56.3%) had died. The high LLR group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis was performed using only those factors (LLR/ECOG PS/bone metastasis regarding OS and LLR/bone metastasis regarding PFS) identified as significant in univariate analyses. A high LLR was an independent predictor of worse OS and PFS. While the NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS, neither NLR nor PLR was a significant predictor of PFS. The LLR is a novel potential prognostic biomarker that integrates tumor metabolism and host immunity in patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Because it can be readily calculated from routine blood tests, it may serve as a cost-effective tool for risk stratification. However, further prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyL-Lactate DehydrogenaseLung NeoplasmsLymphocytesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEtoposideFemaleHumansJapanLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalEtoposideL-Lactate Dehydrogenaseimmune checkpoint inhibitorlactate dehydrogenase-to-lymphocyte ratiooverall survivalprogression-free survivalsmall-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID42601763
PMCPMC13480915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.