ArticleMedicine2026
Association between air pollution and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hebei Province: A time-series study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence regarding the short-term effects of ambient air pollution on acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) across multiple cities in northern China remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between major ambient air pollutants and AECOPD hospitalizations, as well as their lagged effects. We conducted an ecological time-series study of 14,786 AECOPD hospitalizations recorded at 49 hospitals in Shijiazhuang, Handan, and Chengde, Hebei Province, from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. City-specific associations between daily concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), inhalable particulate matter (PM10), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and 8-hour ozone and AECOPD hospitalizations were estimated using distributed lag nonlinear models, with adjustment for long-term trends, temperature, relative humidity, day of the week, public holidays, and stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Single-day lag effects from lag 0 to lag 5, cumulative lag effects from lag 0-1 to lag 0-5, effects of extreme pollutant concentrations, and associations stratified by age and sex were evaluated. City-specific estimates were subsequently pooled using random-effects multivariate meta-analysis. Associations were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. During the 1096-day study period, 14,786 AECOPD hospitalizations were recorded. Compared with the 25th-percentile concentrations, the 75th-percentile concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO generally showed stronger cumulative associations with longer lag periods, with the largest estimates usually observed at lag 0-5 days, whereas single-day effects were weak. All 6 pollutants exhibited nonlinear cumulative exposure-response relationships. Compared with median concentrations, the 99th-percentile concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO were associated with higher hospitalization risks. High PM2.5 reached its maximum effect at lag 0-5 days (relative risk, 1.391; 95% confidence interval, 1.169-1.658). Higher 8-hour ozone concentrations were generally associated with lower hospitalization risk. Associations were more pronounced among adults aged ≥65 years and males. Short-term exposure to PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO was associated with increased AECOPD hospitalization risk, with nonlinear, lagged, and cumulative effects. Older adults and females may be more susceptible to ambient air pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.