ArticleMedicine2026
Complex regional pain syndrome research trends: A bibliometric analysis of the last 3 decades (1993-2025).
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by disproportionate regional pain and distinct clinical features such as allodynia and hyperalgesia. We conducted a bibliometric analysis to map the global research landscape of CRPS over the past 3 decades, with an additional regional analysis of research output from South Korea. By examining publication trends, we aimed to identify active research areas and highlight underrepresented topics.
methodsArticles related to CRPS and published between 1993 and 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data on publication year, journal, country, institution, and citation counts were extracted for analysis. Treatment-related articles were additionally classified into non-interventional and interventional management for subgroup analyses.
resultsA total of 2016 CRPS-related articles were identified, with publication output steadily increasing and accelerating over the past decade. The United States contributed the most, with 497 articles (24.7%), followed by the Netherlands, and South Korea ranked fifth with 134 articles (6.6%). Among treatment-focused studies, 302 addressed non-interventional therapies, dominated by pharmacological treatments, and 397 addressed interventional management, in which spinal cord stimulation and other forms of neuromodulation were the most studied.
conclusionOur results indicate a growing global recognition of CRPS as a significant research area, with increasing attention toward interventional therapies. However, despite the increasing research output, existing guidelines and systematic reviews indicate that high-quality evidence remains limited for both guideline-recommended first-line functional and interdisciplinary approaches and more extensively studied interventional therapies. Rigorous, collaborative research on CRPS treatment is therefore needed to establish effective, evidence-based strategies and improve outcomes for patients with CRPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.