ArticleAsia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists2026
Uncovering Means Restriction Activities for Suicide Prevention That Have Been Undertaken in Australia: A Scoping Review.
Article in Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo map and summarize evidence on means restriction activities that have been implemented for the prevention of suicide across Australia. Further, to provide an overview of the impact of the activities on suicide rates and ascertain barriers/challenges, costs, and any other relevant associated information.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature following JBI-formerly known as Joanna Briggs Institute-methodology for scoping reviews and recommendations by Cochrane Rapid Reviews. Four databases were searched for identifying all published material in English. Gray literature was searched through Google Scholar and state-based and national health commission websites.
resultsWe identified five publications addressing means restriction activities implemented for suicide prevention. All studies describe restriction of access to places where there had been suicides by jumping from a height. The studies concluded that mean restriction activities were valuable in the prevention of suicide by jumping. Further, we reviewed four additional publications describing activities that restricted access to means (e.g., firearms legislation) but where the intervention was not aimed at suicide prevention per se, albeit suicide rates were reported.
conclusionDespite there being few studies available, our review identifies evidence on means restriction activities for the prevention of suicide implemented within Australia and provides a summary of implemented interventions that have been reported to be associated with a decrease in suicide rates. In particular, the apparent benefit of structural interventions at jumping sites supports their broader adoption: any such future activities require careful evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.