ArticleBioData mining2026
EMMA-STRAT: a multi-omics based machine learning framework for stratification of endometrial carcinoma molecular subtypes and MSI status.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy, with molecular heterogeneity influencing prognosis and treatment response. Although TCGA-defined molecular subtypes and multi-omics datasets have improved biological understanding of UCEC, externally evaluated computational frameworks for molecular stratification remain limited. To address this, we developed EMMA-STRAT, a supervised multi-omics machine learning framework integrating mRNA expression, miRNA expression, and DNA methylation data to classify UCEC genomic subtypes and microsatellite instability (MSI) status.
resultsUsing the TCGA cohort (N = 433) for model development and internal validation, we benchmarked six classifiers and evaluated final model performance on two independent Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) cohorts (N = 95 and N = 108). Multi-omics integration consistently outperformed single-omics models, with RNA expression as the strongest standalone modality. For MSI-H versus MSS classification, a LightGBM model trained on 20 SVM-selected features per omics layer achieved an internal balanced accuracy of 98.1% and external balanced accuracies of 93.1-94.9%. For four-class genomic subtyping, a Multi-Layer Perceptron trained on 50 LASSO-selected features per omics layer achieved an internal balanced accuracy of 89.1% and external balanced accuracies of 84.7-86.2%. Both models showed favorable discrimination and probability calibration relative to reference baselines, although calibration estimates for low-prevalence classes including POLE should be interpreted cautiously. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based interpretability analysis identified model-selected features including MLH1, CDKN2A, PPP4R4, and hsa-miR-378a, with downstream analyses supporting their biological plausibility. All results are openly accessible via an interactive browser at https://naisarg14.github.io/EMMA-STRAT-web-viewer/index.html .
conclusionsEMMA-STRAT provides an externally evaluated, research-grade computational framework for multi-omics molecular stratification of endometrial carcinoma. Integration of mRNA, miRNA, and DNA methylation data supported prediction of MSI-H versus MSS status and TCGA-defined genomic subtypes across independent cohorts. However, since EMMA-STRAT requires multi-omics data and was not directly compared with established clinical classifiers, it should currently be interpreted as a research-oriented molecular stratification framework rather than a clinically deployable decision-making model. The developed framework provides a basis for future prospective validation, incorporation of clinicopathological variables, and direct comparison with ProMisE-based or integrated clinical risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.