ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Implementation barriers, facilitators, and fidelity of a mobile money-based savings tool for pregnant women in the Analamanga region of Madagascar: an ex-post process evaluation.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile payment services could improve access to obstetric care by easing saving, raising revenue, and pooling resources. Between 2019 and 2022, a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care was implemented in the Analamanga region of Madagascar following a randomized controlled trial design. We conducted an ex-post process evaluation of the intervention.
methodsWe assessed implementation fidelity and reach of the trial using five indicators from a population-based survey of 6,234 women who were pregnant during the intervention period and lived in catchment areas of 63 public primary-care health facilities (Centres de Santé de Base, CSBs) included in the trial: whether a woman (a) had heard of the tool, (b) could explain what it was, (c) had registered with it, (d) had used it to save, (e) had used it to pay for costs of childbirth. Combining the population-based survey with a healthcare provider survey and in-depth interviews with women, healthcare workers, and implementation staff, we examined factors associated with implementation quality, and barriers and facilitators to take-up.
resultsSensitization led to statistically significantly higher take-up by women living in catchment areas of intervention CSBs compared to control CSBs: 39% vs 13% of surveyed women had heard of the tool, 33% vs 9% knew what it was, 15% vs 4% had registered, 15% vs 3% had saved with it and 10% vs 2% had paid with it. However, awareness and registration varied across intervention CSBs (4%-78%, 0%-54%). Key barriers to take-up included technical difficulties faced by providers, a disruption of informal benefits for providers, and mobile phone access. Learning about the tool from midwives was a facilitator.
conclusionThis study highlights the complexity of introducing a mobile money-based savings tool for obstetric care and the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity to understand trial impact. Strengthening community mobilization, providing more personalized support, and improving intervention compatibility with routine workflows could improve intervention delivery. User-centred design and phased roll-out allowing for continuous improvement cycles may help optimize effective implementation at scale.
trial registrationThe 4MOTHERS trial was registered on March 12, 2021, in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), identifier: DRKS00014928.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.