ArticleBMC neurology2026
Mendelian randomization reveals the causal relationship between cholecystectomy and ischemic stroke.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe association between cholecystectomy and ischemic stroke remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the potential association of genetically predicted liability to cholecystectomy with ischemic stroke and its subtypes using Mendelian randomization (MR).
methodsThe inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analytical method, with weighted median and MR-Egger regression as complementary methods. Overall ischemic stroke was defined as the primary outcome, whereas ischemic stroke subtypes were considered secondary outcomes. A Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold was applied to the three secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and the influence of individual variants were assessed using sensitivity analyses.
resultsGenetically predicted liability to cholecystectomy was not associated with overall ischemic stroke in the primary IVW analysis (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.23-1.37, P = 0.208). In the secondary analyses, the inverse association with small-vessel ischemic stroke remained significant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.57, P = 0.009). The inverse association with large-artery atherosclerotic ischemic stroke was nominally significant but did not meet the corrected threshold (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.71, P = 0.023), whereas no association was observed for cardioembolic ischemic stroke.
conclusionGenetically predicted liability to cholecystectomy was not significantly associated with overall ischemic stroke. The secondary analyses supported an inverse association with small-vessel ischemic stroke and suggested a possible inverse association with large-artery atherosclerotic ischemic stroke. No significant association was observed for cardioembolic ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.