ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2026
Resource allocation decisions faced by health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community intensive care unit in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInsufficient resources and dynamic infection control policies during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated that frontline health care providers (HCPs) make frequent ethical decisions about the allocation of scarce supplies, space, and clinician time to patient care activities. We aimed to understand the process, nature, and impact of these resource allocation decisions.
methodsUsing a qualitative case study approach, we developed an understanding of the decision-making of frontline intensive care unit (ICU) HCPs during the pandemic. We conducted 25 semistructured interviews with multidisciplinary HCPs employed in a community ICU in Ontario, Canada. We then extracted data related to resource allocation decisions and analyzed it within-case, using conventional (inductive) content analysis.
resultsEthical decisions about resource allocation were ubiquitous for all types of HCPs within critical care practice. The constraints imposed by the pandemic and multiple provincial and organizational policies formed the context that necessitated these decisions. Health care providers drew upon a range of values in their decision-making, typically prioritizing HCP safety and patient well-being. Resulting actions included prioritizing clinical tasks, establishing boundaries, and modifying practice patterns. Although these situations commonly evoked stress and frustration among HCPs, feelings of self-efficacy, resourcefulness, and team cohesion were also described.
conclusionsInstitutional policies and pragmatic limitations meant that HCPs in a community ICU in Ontario, Canada needed to make frequent ethical decisions about the allocation of scarce resources during the pandemic. These frequent decisions highlight the degree to which resource allocation is an inherent part of critical care. There is opportunity for targeted professional development to support allocation practices during adverse circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42601591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.