ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
YouTube Videos as a Tool to Educate Medical Students About Careers in Radiation Oncology.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality of educational TikTok videos on diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For medical students, choosing a specialty is a pivotal decision with major professional and personal implications. Career information from popular resources like YouTube may be particularly relevant for radiation oncology, where exposure in medical curricula is limited. This study aims to characterise YouTube videos providing career insights into the field. The first 50 results from six YouTube searches related to radiation oncology careers were programmatically extracted using a Python script, yielding an initial pool of 300 videos. Videos were ranked based on frequency across searches and position in the results. After applying predetermined inclusion criteria, the top 50 videos were analysed using a previously validated video assessment tool. Videos originated from the United States (36/50), India (9/50), Canada (3/50), and Australia (2/50). Most (80%) were released within four years of the search, including 32% in 2020. Half were published by healthcare facilities, with 12 of 25 promoting their respective residency programs. Overall, coverage varied across career needs, with frequent focus on the nature of work (86%), altruism (60%), and intellectual satisfaction (60%), while several aspects, including lifestyle (28%) and salary (18%), received less attention. Radiation oncology careers were often depicted as patient-oriented (74%), technology-driven (72%), compassionate (68%), and meaningful (62%). YouTube videos highlight values inherent to the specialty but underrepresent practical career considerations. These findings characterise one accessible source of radiation oncology career information and identify areas where future resources could provide a more comprehensive overview of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42601569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.