ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Continuous 3% Saline Infusion Combined with 7.5% Hypertonic Saline Bolus is Associated with Lower Mortality in Patients with Severe Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intracranial Pressure Variability and Low Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Burden as Prognostic Markers Beyond Mean Pressure in Neurocritically Ill Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBolus hypertonic saline (HTS) is a cornerstone for managing intracranial hypertension, yet its transient effect mandates repeated dosing and may induce wide sodium fluctuations. Whether augmenting bolus 7.5% HTS with continuous 3% saline infusion to sustain osmotic gradients improves outcomes in neurocritical patients remains unknown.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 993 neurocritical patients treated with 7.5% HTS at a tertiary academic hospital in South Korea. Patients were classified as bolus-alone (n = 851) or combined therapy (7.5% bolus plus 3% continuous infusion; n = 142). The primary analysis focused on patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 3-9; n = 212). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding. Robustness was confirmed through five sensitivity analyses, including multiple imputations and E-value assessment for unmeasured confounding.
resultsIn the severe brain injury subgroup, combined therapy was associated with markedly lower ICU mortality (16.2% vs. 41.1%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.65, p = 0.006) and 28-day mortality (18.9% vs. 45.7%; adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.55, p = 0.002). All five sensitivity analyses consistently confirmed these findings. In the overall cohort, trends favored combined therapy but did not reach significance (ICU mortality: OR 0.58, p = 0.121; 28-day mortality: OR 0.59, p = 0.110), although time-to-event analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit (Kaplan-Meier log-rank p = 0.006). Strikingly, despite a greater total sodium load, the combined group achieved lower peak serum sodium yet superior ICP control, suggesting that sustained osmotic gradients-not peak sodium-drive the benefit.
conclusionsIn patients with severe brain injury, combined 7.5% HTS bolus and 3% continuous saline infusion was associated with substantially lower mortality compared with bolus therapy alone. These findings support further prospective investigation of combination osmotic therapy in neurocritical care. These observational findings should be interpreted with caution; despite IPTW adjustment and high E-values, confounding by indication cannot be fully excluded, and prospective validation is required before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42601563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.