ArticleHippocampus2026
Cancer Treatment and Memory in Breast Cancer Survivors: Differential Effects on Detailed Episodic and Gist-Like Memory Recall Over Time.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) frequently experience chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment, including episodic memory deficits. This study examined the long-term impact of cancer treatment on memory for naturalistic events, using film clips to assess recall of central (gist-like elements; reflects the story narrative) and peripheral (episodic elements; sensory or contextual details related to the event) details. While memory for both types of details typically declines over time, peripheral details are especially vulnerable to decline, and are sensitive to impairment in individuals with medial temporal lobe disruption. Participants (BCS, n = 42; noncancer controls, NC, n = 41) viewed 40 short film clips (encoding). Memory for the clips' content was tested at two timepoints: immediately following encoding (20 clips; immediate retrieval) and after a 7-day delay (20 clips; delayed retrieval). BCS recalled significantly fewer peripheral details than NC, whereas recall of central (gist-like) information did not differ between groups. No group differences were observed across individual sub-categories of peripheral details, temporal sequencing, or the rate of forgetting over the 7-day delay. Subjective memory ratings mirrored objective performance, with BCS reporting lower memory vividness than NC, while reporting comparable memory for story content. These findings suggest that chemotherapy may reduce the overall richness of episodic event representations while preserving central, schematic aspects of memory and the temporal organization of events. Naturalistic memory paradigms that assess the qualitative features of event memory may provide a sensitive approach for detecting subtle treatment-related cognitive changes in cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.