ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology, condylar position, and mandibular functional movement induced by orthodontic treatment in class ii malocclusion: a retrospective study based on CBCT and electronic articulator technology.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the morphological and positional changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), as well as alterations in mandibular functional movement, before and after orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and electronic articulator technology.
methodsA total of 82 adult patients (43 females, 39 males; aged 18-35 years) were retrospectively enrolled, including 54 with Class II Division 1 and 28 with Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Sample size adequacy was evaluated before data analysis, and the final sample size met the minimum requirement for the primary subtype-specific pre-treatment and post-treatment comparisons. All participants underwent comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Among Class II Division 1 patients, 20 were treated without extraction, 13 underwent single-arch extraction, and 21 underwent double-arch extraction; all Class II Division 2 patients were treated without extraction. CBCT was performed before and after treatment to evaluate TMJ morphology and condylar position, including coronal and sagittal joint spaces, axial condylar angle, condylar height, condylar length, condylar sagittal inclination, and glenoid fossa morphology. Mandibular functional movements were assessed using an electronic articulator, including incisal protrusive movement, lateral excursion, mouth opening-closing movement, condylar movement trajectory, and protrusive condylar inclination. The main comparisons were conducted before and after treatment within Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 patients. In Class II Division 1 patients, additional analyses according to extraction pattern were performed only as exploratory subgroup analyses because of the limited sample size in each subgroup.
resultsIn patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, no significant overall changes were observed in condylar size, sagittal inclination, joint space, or fossa morphology after treatment (P > 0.05), whereas the incisal protrusive movement distance significantly decreased (P = 0.020). Exploratory extraction-pattern subgroup analyses suggested mild changes in condylar length, condylar height, sagittal inclination, anterior joint space, and incisal protrusive range; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of patients in each subgroup. In patients with Class II Division 2 malocclusion, bilateral condylar length, height, and sagittal inclination increased significantly following treatment. The left anterior, right anterior, and left superior joint spaces decreased, whereas the posterior joint spaces increased bilaterally. The right posterior slope angle decreased, while the condylar protrusive trajectory angle decreased bilaterally. No significant changes were observed in incisal protrusion, lateral excursion, or mouth opening and closing distances.
conclusionsOrthodontic treatment was associated with adaptive TMJ remodeling in adult patients with Class II malocclusion. Patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion showed overall structural stability with limited functional changes, although exploratory analyses suggested modest remodeling patterns across different extraction subgroups. In contrast, patients with Class II Division 2 malocclusion exhibited more pronounced changes in condylar dimensions, sagittal inclination, joint spaces, and protrusive condylar trajectory. Overall, changes in mandibular functional movements were limited. Because extraction-pattern subgroup analyses were exploratory and based on relatively small samples, these results should not be overinterpreted as definitive evidence of extraction-related TMJ remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42601547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.