Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601529›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

"Efficacy, safety and certainty of evidence for selective D1/D5 dopamine receptor partial agonists in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE assessment".

Ahmad Akhtar Rashid, Anas Mohammad, Umamah Malik, Sabiha Naz, Maaz Hamad, Abdullah Nadeem, Akhtar Rashid

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmad Akhtar RashidSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Anas MohammadSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Umamah MalikSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan. umamahmalik0@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9455-298X
Sabiha NazSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Maaz HamadSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Abdullah NadeemSargodha Medical College, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Akhtar RashidAL-Rashid Hospital, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelective D1/D5 dopamine receptor partial agonists are proposed to provide motor benefit without the impulse control disorders and somnolence associated with D2/D3 dopamine agonists. With tavapadon under regulatory review, no quantitative synthesis of this drug class exists.

methodsEmbase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 31 May 2026 for randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of selective D1/D5 partial agonists in Parkinson's disease (PROSPERO CRD420261347585). Random-effects models (REML) were used. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE.

resultsSeven trials (1,540 participants) were included; five entered quantitative synthesis. In early-stage monotherapy, tavapadon improved the combined MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III score by 10.55 points versus placebo (95% CI - 13.11 to - 7.99; two trials). In levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations, good ON-time increased by 1.09 h per day (0.57 to 1.61; two trials). Adverse events (RR 1.36, 1.09 to 1.71), nausea (6.38, 3.23 to 12.59), dizziness (3.03, 2.15 to 4.27) and discontinuation due to adverse events (2.72, 1.07 to 6.96) were more frequent with tavapadon. Serious adverse events were not increased (Peto OR 1.13, 0.69 to 1.85). Impulse control disorder (RR 2.02, 0.51 to 8.00; nine events, one trial) and somnolence (1.20, 0.37 to 3.92) were rated at very low certainty. No outcome reached high certainty.

conclusionSelective D1/D5 partial agonism improves motor function in early-stage and levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease, at moderate certainty. Its proposed neuropsychiatric advantage over D2/D3 agonists remains untested: no trial used an active comparator or exceeded 27 weeks.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsDopamine AgonistsParkinson DiseaseReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D5HumansAntiparkinson AgentsDopamine AgonistsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D5Dopamine D1 receptorGRADEImpulse control disorderMeta-analysisParkinson’s diseasePartial agonistTavapadon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.